“Military spending is crucial to Britain’s security and standing in world affairs, especially in times of war. The world is in the beginning stages of complete global conflict, so why is George Osborne cutting military spending? Well, he already knows the result of the EU referendum, so he is acting in conjunction with the proposed EU army, which will be separate yet integrated loosely with NATO. There will only be a limited need for a dedicated British team, but when the EU military draft is announced, Brussels will dictate what Britain does in the coming conflict.
“The EU president, Jean Claude Juncker, has called for a dedicated EU military force as a matter of immediate urgency and plans are afoot to include all member states.
“The West’s oil supply lines are already being compromised in the Middle East, as 60% of the globe’s oil reserves lie, and ISIS extends its reach from Syria, through Iraq and into Libya. The ISIS threat has already been spoken of by OPEC, especially after recent attacks inside Saudi Arabia. Yemen has already fallen. Iran is embroiled heavily within the region as the Shiite Vs Sunni wars rage.
“From Libya to Southern Italy is only a short boat ride, and if the conflict spreads to that region, the rest of Europe will be within reach of ISIS. The suicidal EU Schengen policy of open borders will be an open door for ISIS or any other military force cutting through Spain, then onto France and Portugal like a knife through warm butter.
“On the Eastern front, Russia is daily moving troops and military hardware within striking distance of former Soviet bloc nations that are now part of the EU. If Vladimir Putin sees fit to attack, there will be no stopping him as the EU and NATO are too slow to act.
“China is moving military hardware and personnel onto disputed islands in the South China Sea and increasing their base presence in the region controlling the area. China and Japan, who are long time adversaries are readying themselves for another conflict, which would naturally be of grave concern to the United States and EU.
“To therefore cut Britain’s defence budget now would be construed as madness by any sane strategist, especially under the current climate of war, however the modus operandi of George Osborne is to amalgamate Britain’s remaining forces with that of the forming EU army.
“It would be naive to think that Britain would ever leave the EU, especially when the corporations dictate government policy. By giving a referendum to the plebiscite, the government is not risking much, because it knows that the votes are already cast, by the entities that really count, as George Osborne has already signalled with his massive defence cuts.”
Loading ...
Expert evaluation of the Academy of Geopolitics. Displays whether the Russian peacekeepers in Transnistria?
As part of the “law of the jungle” that the United States established in international politics since 1999, Russia takes over the Crimea, with more late-Washington shaking the world order, extending the impact of the Kosovo precedent, when you can not only contrary to international law to separate one part of the country from the other, but even attach it to another country. Thus, 15 years after the US and NATO aggression against Yugoslavia, the consequences of the aggression, caught up as a modern world order, and now Ukraine. In this regard, Russia itself is nothing new comes up, it simply copies the American methodology and approaches in carrying out its imperialist policy. Meanwhile, Russia is quite natural indicates that it does not do anything that did not do the other major imperialist powers, and when she denied the right to do so, it is reasonable to begin to beat the subject of double standards when one somehow possible, while others can not . In this regard, within the framework of this competition, it looks more convincingly than pathetic links Merkel coup trampled the Constitution of Ukraine, and the cries of the Obama entitled violations of international sounding from the leader of a country that international norms and the Yalta-Potsdam world order late-Washington trampled decades. Our experts podcherkyvayut that “The war in Europe, Ukraine is profitable? “- http://clubvi.ru/news/2015/05/25/sargsan/.
Given the purpose of Saakashvili’s hard not to agree that the Russian contingent of the unrecognized republic and come hard times. 3. military means to eliminate the peacekeepers will be difficult, so Kiev together with the pro-Western regime in Moldova, headed for the economic strangulation of the country, based on the ones that the deterioration of living conditions and problems with the supply of peacekeepers make local leaders more amenable, and for the resumption of Russian supply Peacekeepers will make concessions in other areas. In fact, it is outright blackmail, which is trying to cover up the shaking muscles, by transferring under the Odessa batteries of S-300 in response to the discussion of the idea of supplying peacekeepers military transport aviation of the Russian Federation; more detail here, “the head of administration of Putin punished for the Crimea?
“Http://knowpc.ru/razgovory-obo-vsem/glavu-administracii-putina-nakazali-za-krym/.
4. It goes through the air supply is certainly possible, but it is a situational decision. The costs for such an air bridge will be significant, and completely shut down all questions of supply is unlikely to be able to. Plus it is always the possibility for military provocations, because the military board will go over the territory of Ukraine. Plus, if the blockade tightened, the choice of this path will connect to these operations chats significant military transport aviation of the Russian Federation: “The crisis in Ukraine: the way out of the crisis” – http://topwar.ru/51314-krizis-v-ukraine-puti-vyhoda -iz-krizisa.html.
Transnistria followed. Displays whether the Russian peacekeepers in Transnistria? I am sure that there is. Based on the current line, rather more likely option any similar negotiations those on which it was a question of energy supply of the Crimea, as expert evaluation was given to us: http://rusdozor.ru/2015/03/13/krym-put-na -rodinu-2 /. Without the elimination of the current government in Kiev, all these concessions and compromises will not be able to provide long-term guarantees for the interests of Russia and its dependent territories of the Russian Federation: “ISRAEL SENDS Hizb ut-Tahrir to the Crimea” – http://rusdozor.ru/2014/10/24 / izrail-napravlyaet-xizb-ut-taxrir-na-krym /.
Arayik Sargsyan, Academician, President of the Academy of Geopolitics, Honorary Consul of Macedonia to Armenia. http://russmir.info/pol/6611-vyvedet-li-rossiya-iz-pridnestrovya-svoih-mirotvorcev.html